Gauteng Climate Change Act Implementation Reports

Gauteng Provincial GHG Inventory · Scopes 1, 2 & 3 · 20202024 · 2026/06

Gauteng Climate Change Act Implementation Reports

Gauteng’s greenhouse gas inventory for 20202024, compiled under the 2006 IPCC Guidelines and the GHG Protocol for Communities. The province emitted 105,307 Gg CO₂e in 2024, −1.6% on the 107,025 Gg CO₂e recorded in 2020 — a footprint led in every year of the period by the electricity Gauteng buys from the national grid, alongside direct emissions inside the provincial boundary and the transmission losses and imported waste its consumption drives beyond it.

Prepared by Zutari (Pty) Ltd for the Gauteng Department of Environment (GDEnv). Emissions converted to CO₂e using AR5 100-year global warming potentials.

Executive summary

The Gauteng Provincial Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Inventory presents the province’s emissions and removals for the 2020 - 2024 period. It covers direct emissions generated within Gauteng (Scope 1), indirect emissions from purchased electricity (Scope 2), selected value-chain emissions (Scope 3), and emissions and removals from Land Use, Land-Use Change and Forestry (LULUCF).

The inventory was compiled in accordance with the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories, supplemented by the 2019 Refinement to the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories. The Global Protocol for Community-Scale Greenhouse Gas Emission Inventories (GPC) was used to define the provincial inventory boundary and classify emissions by scope.

Relevant national methodologies and emission factors published by DFFE were applied where available. Emissions were converted to carbon dioxide equivalent (CO₂e) using the 100-year global warming potentials from the IPCC Fifth Assessment Report (AR5), as adopted in the inventory (Table ES-1).

Table ES-1 IPCC Global Warming Potentials relative to CO2
Greenhouse gasFormulaGWP₁₀₀
Carbon dioxideCO₂1
MethaneCH₄28
Nitrous oxideN₂O265

Gauteng’s total GHG emissions, excl. LULUCF decreased slightly from 107,025 Gg CO₂e in 2020 to 105,307 Gg CO₂e in 2024. Emissions peaked at 110,670 Gg CO₂e in 2021 before declining to 104,770 Gg CO₂e in 2023 and increasing marginally in 2024. Scope 2 was the largest emissions source throughout the inventory period (Table ES-2).

Inventory year
Figures below follow the selected year.
Total emissions, 2024105,307Gg CO₂eExcluding LULUCF
Change since 2020−1.6%107,025 → 105,307 Gg CO₂e
Indirect share63%Scope 2 and Scope 3 combined
Largest single source55%Scope 2 — purchased electricity
Period peak2021110,670 Gg CO₂e
Average annual change-0.40%2020–2024
Table ES-2: GHG emissions by scope, 2020 - 2024
Scope20202021202220232024
Scope 137,51341,72343,15141,98839,148
Scope 261,77960,23055,32954,92857,552
Scope 37,7338,7177,8057,8548,607
Total, excl. LULUCF107,025110,670106,285104,770105,307

All values are expressed in Gg CO₂e.

Scope 1 emissions increased from 37,513 Gg CO₂e in 2020 to a peak of 43,151 Gg CO₂e in 2022 before declining to 39,148 Gg CO₂e in 2024. Energy was the largest Scope 1 emissions source throughout the period, followed by waste, IPPU and agriculture (Figure ES-1).

Figure ES-1: Gauteng direct GHG emissions by IPCC sector, 2020 - 2024Scope 1
GHG Emissions Gg CO₂e010,00020,00030,00040,00050,00016,5593,74611,5154,861202018,4386,29111,0764,105202119,1235,83911,3415,503202218,5455,47211,7115,136202317,8594,76110,2844,6982024

As shown in Figure ES-2, Indirect emissions were dominated by purchased electricity (scope 2). Scope 2 emissions decreased from 61,779 Gg CO₂e in 2020 to 54,928 Gg CO₂e in 2023 before increasing to 57,552 Gg CO₂e in 2024. Scope 3 emissions ranged between 7,733 and 8,717 Gg CO₂e and were almost entirely associated with electricity transmission and distribution losses. Emissions from imported waste represented a negligible share.

Figure ES-2: Gauteng indirect GHG emissions, 2020–2024Scope 2 & 3
GHG Emissions Gg CO₂e010,00020,00030,00040,00050,00060,00070,00080,00061,7797,727202060,2308,656202155,3297,798202254,9287,848202357,5528,5832024

LULUCF emissions and removals were estimated for 2020 only. The sector recorded net emissions of 2,963 Gg CO₂e, as emissions from Settlements, Grassland and Other Land exceeded removals from Forest Land, Wetlands and Cropland. LULUCF was excluded from the 2021 - 2024 totals because estimates were unavailable for these years.

The Gauteng GHG inventory was compiled using data from the South African Greenhouse Gas Emissions Reporting System (SAGERS), Department of Mineral Resources and Energy (DMRE), Department of Forestry, Fisheries and the Environment (DFFE), Department of Agriculture, Land Reform and Rural Development (DALRRD), South African Waste Information Centre (SAWIC) and other provincial and national sources. Where complete annual data were unavailable, extrapolations and assumptions were applied and documented. The results provide an evidence base for tracking emissions in energy, industrial processes and product use (IPPU), agriculture, land use, land use change and Forestry (LULUCF), and Waste.

1Introduction

1.1 Provincial context

Gauteng is the smallest province in South Africa by land area, covering less than 2% of the country’s total surface area, yet it is the economic hub of the nation. The province is home to an estimated population of over 16 million people, making up about 25.5% of the national population and contributes more than one-third of South Africa’s Gross Domestic Product (GDP). Gauteng includes the major metropolitan municipalities of Johannesburg, Tshwane, and Ekurhuleni, which together form the country’s largest concentration of economic activity, infrastructure, industry, commerce, and services.

As the most urbanised and industrialised province in South Africa, Gauteng attracts significant investment, migration, and development opportunities. However, the same activities that drive economic growth also contribute substantially to greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. High levels of energy consumption, industrial production, transportation demand, commercial activity, and waste generation result in significant emissions. Understanding the relationship between Gauteng’s economic development and GHG emissions is therefore essential for effective climate change planning and sustainable development within the province.

Map of Gauteng showing the Tshwane, Johannesburg and Ekurhuleni metropolitan municipalities alongside the West Rand and Sedibeng district municipalities
Figure 1-1: Gauteng’s metropolitan and district municipalities.

Gauteng’s GHG inventory report covers emissions and removals occurring within the province’s geographical boundary. The inventory covers Gauteng’s three metropolitan municipalities, the City of Johannesburg, City of Tshwane and City of Ekurhuleni, and its two district municipalities, West Rand and Sedibeng, as illustrated in Figure 1-1.

1.2 Background information on climate change

Climate change is one of the most significant environmental, social, and economic challenges facing the world today. The increasing concentration of greenhouse gases (GHGs) in the atmosphere, primarily driven by human activities such as fossil fuel combustion, industrial production, agriculture, and waste management, is driving changes in the global climate system. These changes have farreaching implications, including rising temperatures, increased frequency and intensity of extreme weather events, water insecurity, biodiversity loss, and adverse impacts on human health and economic development. As South Africa's economic hub and most industrialised province, Gauteng plays a critical role in supporting the country's efforts to reduce GHG emissions while promoting sustainable economic growth and climate resilience.

South Africa has demonstrated its commitment to addressing climate change through both international and domestic policy frameworks. As one of the 196 Parties to the Paris Agreement, the country has committed to contributing to the global effort to limit the increase in average global temperatures by reducing GHG emissions and strengthening resilience to climate change. Under the Paris Agreement, Parties are required to prepare, communicate, and periodically update their Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs), which outline national climate mitigation and adaptation commitments

South Africa's first Nationally Determined Contribution (NDC), submitted in 2015, committed the country to limiting national GHG emissions to a range of 398 - 614 MtCO₂e for both 2025 and 2030. In response to increasing scientific evidence and the global ambition to accelerate climate action, South Africa submitted an updated NDC in September 2021, strengthening its mitigation commitments. The revised targets reduced the emissions range for 2025 to 398 - 510 MtCO₂e and for 2030 to 350 - 420 MtCO₂e, representing a substantial increase in ambition compared to the original commitments. Achieving these targets requires coordinated action across all spheres of government and economic sectors, supported by GHG inventories that enable the monitoring of emissions trends and the identification of mitigation opportunities.

A significant milestone in South Africa's climate governance framework was the promulgation of the Climate Change Act, 2024 (Act No. 22 of 2024) in July 2024. The Act establishes a comprehensive legal framework to support an effective national climate change response and facilitate South Africa's transition towards a low-carbon, climate-resilient economy and society. Building upon the principles and provisions of the National Environmental Management Act, the Climate Change Act provides for integrated climate change governance across national, provincial, and municipal spheres of government. It also promotes GHG emissions reduction, climate risk assessment, and coordinated planning to ensure that climate considerations are incorporated into development planning and decision-making processes.

1.3 Background information on GHG Inventories

Within the Climate Change Act context, provincial GHG inventories have become increasingly important. They contribute to improving the quality of national GHG reporting by providing more detailed and accurate sub-national data. The primary objective of this inventory is to establish a transparent, consistent, and credible estimate of Gauteng's GHG emissions and removals for the 2020–2024 period. This GHG Inventory presents an assessment of GHG emissions and removals for Gauteng Province using activity data for the period 2020 to 2024. The inventory has been compiled using the 2006 Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National GHG Inventories. The 2006 IPCC Guidelines were adopted to ensure methodological consistency with previous provincial GHG inventories and to facilitate the comparison of emissions trends over time.

The last Gauteng GHG inventory was compiled in 2024. This inventory uses the 2006 IPCC Guidelines. The inventory accounts exclusively for Scope 1 (direct) GHG emissions occurring within the provincial boundary. As such, it excludes Scope 2 emissions associated with purchased electricity, steam, heating, or cooling, as well as any other indirect emissions (Scope 3). The inventory therefore provides a baseline assessment of direct emissions generated by activities within Gauteng Province, forming the foundation for future emissions tracking, reporting, and climate change mitigation planning.

Building on this baseline, the current Gauteng provincial GHG Inventory covering the period 2020–2024 has been developed using the same methodological approach and IPCC Guidelines to ensure consistency and comparability with the previous inventory. However, the scope of the inventory has been expanded to include Scope 2 emissions from purchased electricity, and Scope 3 emissions from electricity losses (distribution and transmission), as well as waste imported (landfilled). The inclusion of indirect emissions provides a more comprehensive representation of Gauteng's GHG footprint by capturing emissions associated with energy consumption and other activities that occur outside the provincial boundary but are driven by economic activities within the province.

1.4 Institutional arrangements for Gauteng GHG Inventory preparations

The Gauteng Department of Environment (GDEnv) is responsible for the coordination and management of the provincial GHG Inventory as part of the province’s climate change mitigation planning, monitoring, reporting, and evaluation functions. The Department leads the compilation, quality assurance, and publication of the provincial GHG inventory, ensuring that the inventory is developed in accordance with nationally approved methodologies and international good practice.

Although the GDEnv plays the lead role in compiling and reporting the provincial GHG inventory, the successful preparation of the inventory relies on collaboration with a range of provincial departments, municipalities, state-owned entities, and other relevant institutions. Moreover, the Department coordinates data collection, engaging with data providers and undertaking quality control. This collaborative institutional arrangement strengthens the transparency, consistency, completeness, and accuracy of the inventory.

1.5 Objective of the project

The primary objective of the project is to develop a Gauteng Provincial GHG Inventory. This includes compiling and analysing activity data to estimate provincial GHG emissions and removals, preparing a comprehensive and transparent inventory, and identifying data gaps and opportunities for improving future inventory development and reporting.

1.6 Purpose of the Report

The purpose of this report is to present a comprehensive assessment of GHG emissions and removals within Gauteng Province by quantifying emissions across the relevant IPCC sectors (Energy, IPPU, AFOLU and Waste sectors). The report provides the province’s emissions profile using approved GHG inventory methodologies and activity data. It identifies the sources and sinks of emissions and highlights areas where data quality and reporting can be improved. The GHG inventory serves as an important evidence base for emissions reduction planning and the monitoring of mitigation interventions. Furthermore, it supports compliance with the requirements of the Climate Change Act, strengthens provincial GHG monitoring and reporting systems, and contributes to South Africa's national GHG inventory and climate change commitments

2Gauteng Inventory Report, 2020 – 2024

2.1 Inventory Boundary

The GHG emissions inventory for the Gauteng province over the 2020 - 2024 period follows both the 2006 IPCC guidelines1 and the Global Protocol for Community-Scale Greenhouse Gas Emission Inventories: An accounting and Reporting Standard for Cities which was developed by the World Resources Institute (WRI 2014)2.

The inventory provides an overview of the provincial GHG footprint by emission scope and sector. Scope 1, 2 and 3 emissions are presented to illustrate the relative contribution of direct and indirect emission sources to the overall provincial GHG footprint. Scope 1 emissions are further disaggregated by IPCC sector and source category to identify the major contributors to direct GHG emissions within the province. A summary of the emission scopes and source categories included in the inventory is presented below:

Table 2-1Emission scopes and sources included in the inventory
Scope 1Scope 2Scope 3
Agriculture, forestry and other land useGrid-supplied electricity (delivered / consumed in Gauteng)Waste generated outside the province and imported into Gauteng
Stationary and mobile fuel combustion (in-boundary transportation)Transmission and distribution losses
Industrial processes and product use (IPPU)
Waste generated and disposed inside Gauteng

A detailed description of the methodologies, activity data, emission factors, assumptions and equations applied to estimate emissions for each source category is provided in the Methodology for Calculating GHG Emissions for the Gauteng Province section.

2.2 Overview of Gauteng GHG Emissions

The Gauteng GHG footprint consisted of direct (Scope 1), indirect electricity-related (Scope 2) and selected value chain (Scope 3) emissions. Total GHG emissions by scope over the 2020 - 2024 inventory period are presented in Table 2-2 and Error! Reference source not found.

Scope 2 emissions accounted for the largest share of Gauteng’s total GHG emissions (excl. LULUCF) throughout the inventory period, reflecting Gauteng's reliance on electricity supplied through South Africa's predominantly fossil fuel-based national grid. Scope 1 emissions were the second-largest contributor to Gauteng GHG emissions in the inventory period and included direct GHG emissions from sources within the provincial boundary (Energy, IPPU, Agriculture and Waste). Scope 3 emissions accounted for the smallest share of the provincial GHG footprint throughout the inventory period. The major contributor to scope 3 emissions are emissions from electricity transmission and distribution losses, while emissions from imported waste contributes only a small proportion of total Scope 3 emissions

Table 2-2: Gauteng greenhouse gas emissions by scope, excl LULUCF (Gg CO₂e)
Scope20202021202220232024
Scope 137,51341,72343,15141,98839,148
Scope 261,77960,23055,32954,92857,552
Scope 37,7338,7177,8057,8548,607
Total107,025110,670106,285104,770105,307
Figure 2-1: Provincial Greenhouse Gas Emissions by Scope (%) excl. LULUCF, 2020 - 2024
0%20%40%60%80%100%35%58%7%202039%56%8%202140%52%7%202239%51%7%202337%54%8%2024

2.2.1 Emissions breakdown by sector

In 2024, Gauteng's GHG emissions totalled 105,307 Gg CO₂e, excl. LULUCF. As shown in Figure 2-2, scope 2 emissions from purchased electricity represented the largest share (55%) of total GHG emissions, scope 1 emissions accounted for 37% of the inventory and were primarily generated by the Energy sector (transport, stationary combustion and fugitive sources), followed by the Waste, IPPU and Agriculture sectors, scope 3 emissions contributed the remaining 8% of total emissions and were almost entirely associated with electricity transmission and distribution (T&D) losses, while imported waste represented a negligible share. As shown in Table 2-3, this distribution of emissions remained broadly consistent across the 2020 - 2024 inventory period.

Figure 2-2: Breakdown of total GHG emissions by scope and Scope 1 emission sources, 2024.
Scope 137%Scope 255%(purchasedelectricity)Scope 38%(T&D losses &waste imported)Energy —transport17%Agriculture1%IPPU4%Waste10%Energy — stationary5%
Table 2-3: Annual GHG emissions by scope and emission source, 2020—2024 (Gg CO₂e).
ScopeEmission source20202021202220232024
Scope 1Energy — transport16,55918,43819,12318,54517,859
Energy — stationary3,7466,2915,8395,4724,761
Energy — fugitive03520.0810.0010.65
Waste11,51511,07611,34111,71110,284
IPPU4,8614,1055,5035,1364,698
Agriculture8321,4621,3441,1241,544
Scope 2Electricity purchased61,77960,23055,32954,92857,552
Scope 3T&D losses7,7278,6567,7987,8488,583
Waste imported6627625
Total107,025110,672106,284104,770105,307

2.3 Scope 1 GHG Emissions

Scope 1 emissions are all direct emissions sources located within the geographical boundary of the Gauteng province. The direct sources of emissions include agriculture, stationary and mobile fuel combustion (in-boundary transportation), industrial processes and product use, and waste generated and disposed inside Gauteng. The Scope 1 emissions presented in this section are reported in accordance with the IPCC sector codes and categories and represent only direct emissions occurring within the provincial boundary. Indirect emissions (scope 2 and 3) are presented in the subsequent sections of this chapter.

2.3.1 GHG Emissions and Trends by IPCC sector

Table 2-4 and Figure 2-3 present the total Scope 1 GHG emissions by IPCC sector over the 2020 - 2024 inventory period.

Table 2-4: Gauteng’s GHG emissions by IPCC sectors, 2020 - 2024
IPCC categoriesGHG Emissions (Gg CO₂e)
20202021202220232024
TOTAL (excl. LULUCF)37,51341,72343,15141,98839,148
TOTAL (incl. LULUCF)43,98641,72343,15141,98839,148
1ENERGY20,30525,08024,96324,01722,621
1A1Energy Industries3752,2461,5821,9631,640
1A2Manufacturing Industries & Construction3,1923,4963,5472,9992,726
1A3Transportation16,55918,43819,12318,54517,859
1A4Other Industries180549709510395
1A5Non-Specified-0.4960.731--
1BFugitive Emissions-3520.0810.0010.645
2IPPU4,8614,1055,5035,1364,698
2A3Glass Production90136767573
2A4Other Process Uses of Carbonates239241275215225
2B2Nitric Acid Production0.1410.2600.1930.110-
2C1Iron and Steel Production4,5003,6845,1174,8224,376
2C2Ferroalloys Production2837282424
2C5Lead Production3.47.26.4--
3AGRICULTURE8321,4621,3441,1241,544
3A1Enteric Fermentation7001,3251,2059841,397
3A2Manure Management2929293029
3C2Liming4144464651
3C4Direct N₂O Emissions from Managed Soils3031323234
3C5Indirect N₂O Emissions from Managed Soils1111121112
3C6Indirect N₂O Emissions from Manure Management2121212121
LULUCF6,473NENENENE
4AForest Land-923
4BCropland1,797
4CGrassland2,219
4DWetlands-642
4ESettlements3,661
4FOther Land361
5WASTE11,51511,07611,34111,71110,284
5ASolid Waste Disposal5,3845,4715,4605,6615,762
5BBiological Treatment of Solid Waste239212274305362
5CIncineration and Open Burning of Waste352357375370376
5DWastewater Treatment and Discharge5,5415,0355,2325,3743,783
Figure 2-3: Gauteng GHG emissions by IPCC sectors, excl. LULUCF (2020 – 2024)
GHG Emissions Gg CO₂e010,00020,00030,00040,00050,00016,5593,74611,5154,861202018,4386,29111,0764,105202119,1235,83911,3415,503202218,5455,47211,7115,136202317,8594,76110,2844,6982024
2.3.1.1 Energy GHG Emissions (2024)

The Energy sector includes GHG emissions from stationary fuel combustion, mobile fuel combustion, fugitive sources and other fuel combustion activities occurring within the provincial boundary. In 2024, the Energy sector emitted 22,621 Gg CO₂e, accounting for approximately 58% of total Scope 1 emissions and 21% of the total provincial GHG footprint. The contribution of each Energy source category is presented in Figure 2-4.

  • Transportation was the largest source of Energy sector emissions, contributing 17,859 Gg CO₂e (approximately 79%) of total Energy sector emissions. Road transportation accounted for almost all transport-related emissions, while domestic aviation contributed a comparatively small proportion.
  • Manufacturing Industries and Construction was the second-largest contributor, emitting 2,726 Gg CO₂e (approximately 12%) of total Energy sector emissions. Emissions were generated across several industrial subsectors, including iron and steel, chemicals, non-metallic minerals, food processing, mining, and pulp and paper.
  • Energy Industries contributed 1,640 Gg CO₂e (approximately 7%) of total Energy sector emissions, with emissions primarily associated with electricity generation.
  • Other Industries, Non-Specified and Fugitive Emissions together accounted for the remaining 2% of Energy sector emissions, indicating a comparatively minor contribution to the overall Energy emissions profile.
Figure 2-4: Energy GHG Emissions, 2024
7%12%2%79%
  • Energy Industries
  • Manufacturing Industries & Construction
  • Transportation
  • Other Industries
  • Non-Specified
  • Fugitive Emissions
2.3.1.2 IPPU GHG Emissions (2024)

The IPPU sector includes GHG emissions released from industrial processes and the use of products, excluding emissions associated with fuel combustion. In 2024, the IPPU sector emitted 4,698 Gg CO2e, accounting for approximately 12% of total Scope 1 emissions and 4.5% of the total provincial GHG footprint. The contribution of each IPPU source category is presented in Figure 2-5.

  • Iron and Steel Production was the dominant source of IPPU emissions, contributing approximately 93% of total IPPU emissions. This reflects the significant contribution of iron and steel manufacturing activities to the provincial industrial emissions profile.
  • Other Process Uses of Carbonates was the second-largest contributor, accounting for approximately 5% of total IPPU emissions.
  • Glass Production contributed approximately 2% of total IPPU emissions.
  • Nitric Acid Production, Ferroalloys Production and Lead Production together accounted for a negligible proportion of total IPPU emissions, indicating a comparatively minor contribution to the overall IPPU emissions profile.
Figure 2-5: IPPU GHG Emissions, 2024
2%5%93%
  • Glass Production
  • Other Process Uses of Carbonates
  • Nitric Acid Production
  • Iron and Steel Production
  • Ferroalloys Production
  • Lead Production
2.3.1.3 Agriculture, excl LULUCF GHG Emissions (2024)

The agriculture sector includes GHG emissions associated with livestock production and managed agricultural soils. In 2024, the agriculture sector emitted 1,544 Gg CO2e, accounting for approximately 4% of total Scope 1 emissions and 1.5% of the total provincial GHG footprint. The contribution of each agricultural source category is presented in Figure 2-6.

  • Enteric Fermentation was the dominant source of agricultural emissions, contributing approximately 91% of total Agriculture sector emissions. This reflects the significant contribution of methane emissions from livestock digestion, particularly cattle.
  • Liming was the second-largest contributor, accounting for approximately 3% of total Agriculture sector emissions.
  • Indirect N₂O Emissions from Managed Soils and Indirect N₂O Emissions from Manure Management each accounted for approximately 1% of total Agriculture sector emissions, indicating a comparatively minor contribution to the overall agricultural emissions profile.
Figure 2-6: Agriculture GHG Emissions, 2024
91%1%1%2%3%2%
  • Enteric Fermentation
  • Manure Management
  • Liming
  • Direct N₂O Emissions from Managed Soils
  • Indirect N₂O Emissions from Managed Soils
  • Indirect N₂O Emissions from Manure Management
2.3.1.4 Land Use and Land Use Change (2020)

The LULUCF sector accounted for net emissions of approximately 6,473 Gg CO2e in 2020. Figure 2-7 presents the contribution of each land-use category to the sector’s net emissions. Positive values represent emissions, while negative values represent removals from the atmosphere.

In 2020, settlements were the largest net emissions source, emitting 3,661 Gg CO2e. Cropland, grassland and other land were also net sources, with net emissions of 1,797 Gg CO2e, 2,219 Gg CO2e and 361 Gg CO2e, respectively. These emissions were partly offset by removals from Forest Land and Cropland. Forest Land accounted for the largest removals at 923 Gg CO2e, followed by Wetlands at 642 Gg CO2e.

The GHG emissions and removals in the LULUCF are calculated using a minimum of 20 years data. Collection of these data is done periodically and is aligned with the DFFE reporting. The last reporting used the 2020 data. In the interim between the reporting periods, the emissions and removals for the latest reporting can be assumed.

Figure 2-7: Gauteng LULUCF emissions and removals by land-use category (Gg CO₂e)
Net GHG emissions and removals (Gg CO₂e)-1,00001,0002,0003,0004,0005,0006,0007,0003,661+Settlements2,219+Grassland1,797+Cropland361Other land923Forest land642=Wetlands6,473Net Emissions
2.3.1.5 Waste GHG Emissions (2024)

The Waste sector includes GHG emissions from solid waste disposal, biological treatment of solid waste, incineration and open burning of waste, and wastewater treatment and discharge. In 2024, the Waste sector emitted 10,284 Gg CO₂e, accounting for approximately 26% of total Scope 1 emissions and 9.8% of the total provincial GHG footprint. The contribution of each waste source category is presented in Figure 2-8.

  • Solid Waste Disposal was the largest source of Waste sector emissions, contributing approximately 56% of total Waste sector emissions. This reflects methane emissions generated from the anaerobic decomposition of organic waste disposed at landfill sites.
  • Wastewater Treatment and Discharge was the second-largest contributor, accounting for approximately 37% of total Waste sector emissions.
  • Incineration and Open Burning of Waste contributed approximately 4% of total Waste sector emissions.
  • Biological Treatment of Solid Waste accounted for approximately 3% of total Waste sector emissions, indicating a comparatively minor contribution to the overall Waste emissions profile.
Figure 2-8: Waste GHG Emissions, 2024
56%37%4%3%
  • Solid Waste Disposal
  • Biological Treatment of Solid Waste
  • Incineration and Open Burning of Waste
  • Wastewater Treatment and Discharge

2.4 Scope 2 GHG Emissions

Scope 2 emissions are indirect GHG emissions associated with the consumption of purchased electricity within Gauteng. Annual electricity consumption and the corresponding Scope 2 GHG emissions for the 2020 - 2024 inventory period are presented in Table 2-5Error! Reference source not found. below.

Scope 2 emissions accounted for the largest share of the Gauteng GHG footprint throughout the inventory period (more than 50% annually). Emissions decreased from 61,779 Gg CO2e in 2020 to 54,928 Gg CO2e in 2023, before increasing to 57,552 Gg CO2e in 2024. This trend closely reflects changes in provincial electricity consumption, which declined from 57,203 GWh in 2020 to 51,819 GWh in 2023 before increasing to 53,289 GWh in 2024.

Table 2-5: Gauteng Scope 2 Emissions, 2020 - 2024
ParameterUnit20202021202220232024
Electricity consumedGWh57,20357,91354,78151,81953,289
Scope 2 emissionsGg CO₂e61,77960,23055,32954,92857,552

2.5 Scope 3 GHG Emissions

The sources of Scope 3 GHG emissions included in this inventory are electricity transmission and distribution (T&D) losses and imported waste disposed within Gauteng. Electricity T&D losses are indirect emissions associated with electricity lost as heat during transmission and distribution from the point of generation to end users. Imported waste refers to municipal solid waste generated outside Gauteng but disposed of at waste disposal facilities within the province. Annual Scope 3 emissions for the 2020 - 2024 inventory period are presented in Table 2-6 and Table 2-7.

  • Electricity transmission and distribution losses were the dominant source of Scope 3 emissions throughout the inventory period, accounting for more than 99% of total Scope 3 emissions.
  • Waste imported emissions were comparatively small, contributing less than 1% of total Scope 3 emissions over the inventory period. Although the quantity of imported waste varied between years, its contribution to total Scope 3 emissions remained negligible.
Table 2-6: T&D Losses and Scope 3 GHG Emissions, 2020 - 2024
ParameterUnit20202021202220232024
T&D lossesGWh7,1558,3237,7217,4047,947
Scope 3 emissionsGg CO₂e7,7278,6567,7987,8488,583
Table 2-7: Imported Waste and Associated Scope 3 GHG Emissions, 2020 - 2024
ParameterUnit20202021202220232024
Imported wastetonnes5,57558,1176,5355,78223,226
Scope 3 emissionsGg CO₂e6627625
3Methodology for Calculating GHG Emissions for the Gauteng Province

1 ENERGY

This section describes the methodology and assumptions used to estimate emissions for energy. The energy sector includes emissions from fuel combustion and fugitive emissions from fuels. This coversfuel combustion activities across all sectors, as well as fugitive emissions related to the production, processing, transmission, storage, and distribution of fuels. IPCC Energy Categories Included in the Gauteng GHG Inventory are:

  • 1A1 Energy Industries
  • 1A2 Manufacturing Industries and Construction
  • 1A3 Transportation
  • 1A4 Other Industries
  • 1A5 Non-specified Industries
  • 1B Fugitive Emissions

1.1 Methodology

Energy sector emissions were estimated using a combination of emissions data reported through the South African Greenhouse Gas Emissions Reporting System (SAGERS) and fuel consumption data from the Department of Mineral Resources and Energy (DMRE).

SAGERS-reported emissions were used directly following data checks to confirm the correct classification of records by inventory year, province, municipality and IPCC category. The reported emissions were then aggregated by year and IPCC category. DMRE fuel consumption data were disaggregated by fuel type and allocated to the relevant IPCC source categories. Total Energy sector emissions were therefore derived as the sum of emissions reported through SAGERS and emissions calculated from the DMRE fuel consumption data.

Emissions from fuel consumption reported by the DMRE were estimated by applying the relevant net calorific values, emission factors and GWPs to the quantity of fuel consumed, as shown below:

Equation 1-1: Calculation of Energy sector GHG emissionsGHG Emissions = Σᵢ (Fuel consumption × NCV × EFᵢ) × GWPᵢ
i
Greenhouse gas type
Fuel consumption
Quantity of fuel consumed (litres)
NCV
Net Calorific Value of the fuel (TJ/litre)
EFᵢ
Emission factor for the greenhouse gas type i (kg gas/TJ)
GWPᵢ
Global Warming Potential of the greenhouse gas type i (1 for CO₂, 28 for CH₄ and 265 for N₂O)

Following the classification and calculation steps described above, emissions derived from DMRE fuel consumption data and emissions reported through SAGERS were aggregated by inventory year and IPCC source category to determine total Energy sector emissions for Gauteng. The resulting emissions were reported as carbon dioxide equivalent (CO₂e) using the global warming potentials adopted for the inventory.

1.2 Activity Data

  • The main data sources for the Energy sector were SAGERs and DMRE.
  • SAGERS provides activity data and emissions data by year, sector, IPCC code, activity detail, province, and municipality. For this inventory, subcategories associated with IPCC codes falling within the Energy sector were identified and grouped accordingly within the Energy sector.
  • The SAGERS data used in this inventory are confidential and not publicly available. The data were provided by DFFE to the Province specifically for preparing the provincial GHG inventory. Accordingly, only aggregated SAGERS emissions results are presented in this report
  • Fuel sales volume data were obtained from the DMRE’s publicly available SA Fuel Sales Volume database. The quarterly disaggregated datasets provide fuel sales by magisterial district and fuel type. Records were mapped to the relevant provincial districts, aggregated by inventory year and allocated to the appropriate IPCC Energy categories. Emissions were then estimated using the methodology described above.
Table 1-1: Fuel consumption used for estimating energy-related emissions in Gauteng, 2020 - 2023
Units: Liters
ProvinceYearJet FuelAviation GasolineDieselFurnace OilLPGParaffinPetrol
Gauteng2020530,249,070728,7982,950,670,842122,781,3879,667,83161,894,3103,135,066,821
2021504,497,1541,045,1643,205,191,32476,098,74517,746,778140,180,9893,440,817,407
2022683,254,457224,4203,278,990,50274,095,11842,078,045152,784,7733,530,440,257
2023837,769,57087,2653,368,248,35654,123,34324,781,245178,826,7353,502,774,899

1.3 Emission Factors

  • For SAGERS data, emissions were already provided in the dataset. Therefore, no additional emission factors were applied to the SAGERS-reported emissions. SAGERs uses country-specific and IPCC default emission factors, as shown in the table below:
Table 1-2: SAGERs fuel properties and emission factors used for Energy-related emissions
FuelEmission Factors (kg GHG/TJ)Methodology Tiers
CH₄CO₂N₂OCH₄CO₂N₂O
Other Biogas154,6000.1111
Sasol Gas (Mrg)054,8880222
Sasol Gas (Mrg)154,8910.1121
Natural Gas155,6640.1121
Natural Gas155,7090.1121
Natural Gas156,1000.1111
Liquefied Petroleum Gases063,1000333
Paraffin364,6400.6121
Liquefied Petroleum Gases164,8520.1111
Acetylene367,8700.6121
Petrol369,3000.6111
Jet Kerosene371,5000.6111
Other Kerosene371,9000.6111
Petrol072,4300222
Residual Fuel Oil (Heavy Fuel Oil)373,0900.6111
Waste Oils3073,3004131
Jet Kerosene073,4632222
Other (Polyfuel)373,8050.6111
Other Bituminous Coal173,9401.5131
Diesel374,1000.6111
Other Bituminous Coal174,4831.5131
Diesel374,6380.6121
Used Oil175,7001.5111
Other Bituminous Coal175,8421.5131
Sasol Fuel Oil 10375,8970.6121
Residual Fuel Oil (Heavy Fuel Oil)377,4000.6111
Sasol Ls-Hfo377,6380.6121
Other Bituminous Coal178,4121.5131
Other Bituminous Coal178,9061.5131
Coal Tar180,7001.5111
Other Bituminous Coal182,9121.5121
Coal Slurry183,3301.5333
Tyre185,0001.5121
Other Bituminous Coal192,0931.5333
Anthracite193,3311.5111
Coking Coal194,6001.5111
Sub-Bituminous Coal196,1001.5111
Sub -Bituminous Coal196,7331.5121
Sub-Bituminous Coal196,7731.5111
Sub-Bituminous Coal196,7771.5121
Other Bituminous Coal196,7961.5131
Other Bituminous Coal198,0391.5131
Anthracite198,3001.5111
Other Primary Solid Biomass30100,0004131
Lignite1101,0001.5111
Lignite1103,6101.5111
Wood/Wood Waste30112,0004111
Industrial Wastes30143,0004111
  • For DMRE fuel consumption data, the applicable net calorific values, fuel densities, and Tier 1 default or Tier 2 country-specific emission factors were applied to convert fuel quantities to energy units and estimate CO₂, CH₄ and N₂O emissions. The resulting emissions were converted to CO₂e using the global warming potentials adopted for the inventory. Table 1-3 table below shows the fuel properties and emissions factors used to calculate energy sector emissions.
Table 1-3: Fuel properties and emission factors applied to DMRE fuel consumption data
FuelCO₂ (kg/TJ)CH₄ (kg/TJ)N₂O (kg/TJ)
DF (Tier 1)CS (Tier 2)DF (Tier 1)DF (Tier 1)
LiquidJet fuel71,50073,46330.6
Aviation Gasoline70,00065,75230.6
Diesel74,10074,63830.6
Furnace Oil77,40073,09030.6
LPG63,10064,85210.1
Paraffin71,90064,64030.6
Petrol69,30072,43030.6
Table 1-4: Country-specific net calorific values and densities for liquid fuels
FuelNCVUnitDensity (kg/ℓ)
LiquidJet fuel37.5MJ/ℓ0.79
Aviation Gasoline33.9MJ/ℓ0.714
Diesel35.5MJ/ℓ0.826
Furnace Oil41.60MJ/ℓ0.990
LPG46.29MJ/ℓ0.555
Paraffin37.5MJ/ℓ0.765
Petrol32.5MJ/ℓ0.741

1.4 Assumptions and Limitations

  • The inventory relies on the accuracy and completeness of the SAGERS and DMRE datasets.
  • SAGERS-reported emissions were used directly after data checks were performed. The checks focused on ensuring that the data was correctly classified by year, province, municipality and IPCC code.
  • DMRE fuel consumption data were disaggregated by fuel type, including jet fuel, aviation gasoline, diesel, petrol, furnace oil, LPG and paraffin. Jet fuel and aviation gasoline were classified under 1A3a Domestic Aviation; diesel and petrol were classified under 1A3b Road Transport; LPG was classified under 1A4a Commercial/Institutional; paraffin was classified under 1A4b Residential; and furnace oil was included under 1A1ai Electricity Generation.
  • Extrapolations (SAGERS): Emissions data were available for 2021–2024. 2020 emissions were estimated by applying the arithmetic mean of the available annual emissions for each relevant IPCC source category.
  • Extrapolations (DMRE): Fuel consumption data were available for 2020–2023. 2024 fuel quantities were estimated using the arithmetic mean of the available annual fuel consumption, after which emissions were calculated using the applicable emission factors.

2 INDUSTRIAL PROCESSES AND PRODUCT USE (IPPU)

This section describes the methodology and assumptions used to estimate emissions from IPPU. The IPPU sector includes emissions that arise from industrial processes and the use of products, excluding emissions from fuel combustion. This covers process-related emissions from activities such as mineral, chemical and metal production, as well as emissions from product use, including refrigerants and other industrial products where applicable. IPCC IPPU Categories included in the Gauteng GHG inventory:

  • 2A3 Glass Production
  • 2A4 Other Process Uses of Carbonates
  • 2B2 Nitric Acid Production
  • 2C1 Iron and Steel Production
  • 2C2 Ferroalloys Production
  • 2C5 Lead Production

2 INDUSTRIAL PROCESSES AND PRODUCT USE (IPPU)

This section describes the methodology and assumptions used to estimate emissions from IPPU. The IPPU sector includes emissions that arise from industrial processes and the use of products, excluding emissions from fuel combustion. This covers process-related emissions from activities such as mineral, chemical and metal production, as well as emissions from product use, including refrigerants and other industrial products where applicable. IPCC IPPU Categories included in the Gauteng GHG inventory:

  • 2A3 Glass Production
  • 2A4 Other Process Uses of Carbonates
  • 2B2 Nitric Acid Production
  • 2C1 Iron and Steel Production
  • 2C2 Ferroalloys Production
  • 2C5 Lead Production

2.1 Methodology

Industrial Processes and Product Use (IPPU) sector emissions were estimated using emissions data reported through the South African Greenhouse Gas Emissions Reporting System (SAGERS).

The data were then filtered to include the relevant IPPU source categories and aggregated by year and IPCC category. The IPPU sector emissions for Gauteng were reported in carbon dioxide equivalent (CO₂e).

2.2 Activity Data

  • No separate activity data were used to calculate IPPU emissions, as the relevant emissions were reported directly through SAGERS. Following data checks, records relating to the applicable IPPU categories were selected and aggregated by inventory year and IPCC category to determine total IPPU emissions for Gauteng
  • The SAGERS emissions data and DMRE fuel consumption data used in this inventory are confidential and are not publicly available. The datasets were provided by DFFE to the Province specifically for the preparation of the provincial GHG inventory. Accordingly, only aggregated data and results are presented in this report.

2.3 Emission Factors

  • For SAGERS data, emissions were already provided in the dataset. Therefore, no additional emission factors were applied to the SAGERS-reported emissions. SAGERs uses country-specific and IPCC default emission factors, as shown in the table below:
Table 2-1: Emission factors used for IPPU-related emissions
FuelEmission Factors (kg GHG/TJ)Methodology Tiers
CH₄CO₂N₂OCH₄CO₂N₂O
Natural Gas155,7090.1121
Integrated or Tailgas NO2 destruction000.0025333
  • The IPPU emission factors reported in the SAGERS dataset appear to be incomplete. This is likely because most IPPU emissions were estimated using a Tier 3 approach, which applies facilityspecific activity data and emission factors. As these emission factors are specific to individual facilities, they may not be included in the summary emission factor dataset, potentially due to confidentiality considerations

2.4 Assumptions and Data Limitations

  • SAGERs dataset included a category recorded as 1A2n. Following a review of the IPCC Guidelines and relevant supporting material, this category was reclassified under the IPPU sector, specifically under 2A4 Ceramics.
  • The inventory relies on the accuracy and completeness of the SAGERs dataset
  • Extrapolations (SAGERS): Emissions data were available for 2021–2024. 2020 emissions were estimated by applying the arithmetic mean of the available annual emissions for each relevant IPCC source category.

3 AGRICULTURE

This section describes the methodology and assumptions used to estimate emissions from the agriculture sector. The agriculture sector includes emissions from livestock and agricultural land management activities, excluding emissions from fuel combustion, which are reported under the Energy sector. This covers emissions from activities such as enteric fermentation, manure management, managed soils, crop residues, and the application of lime, where applicable. IPCC Agriculture Categories included in the inventory:

  • 3A1 Enteric Fermentation
  • 3A2 Manure Management
  • 3C2 Liming
  • 3C4 Direct N2O emissions from managed soils
  • 3C5 Indirect N2O emissions from managed soils
  • 3C6 Indirect N2O emissions from manure management

3.1 Enteric Fermentation and Manure Management

Enteric fermentation emissions refer to methane emissions generated during the digestive process of livestock, particularly ruminant animals such as cattle, sheep and goats. In this inventory, enteric fermentation emissions were calculated for cattle, sheep, goats and swine

3.1.1 Methodology

Enteric fermentation emissions were estimated using a Tier 2 approach, consistent with the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National GHG inventories. The approach applies livestock category-specific emission factors that reflect the characteristics of different animal types, including herd composition.

Annual livestock population data for each livestock category were used as the activity data. South Africa-specific Tier 2 enteric fermentation emission factors, expressed in kg CH₄/head/year, developed by the DFFE, were applied to the corresponding livestock populations. Methane emissions were estimated separately for each livestock category and year by multiplying the livestock population by the applicable emission factor, using the following equation:

Equation 3-1: Calculation of Enteric Fermentation Methane EmissionsCH₄ emissions = Σ (Livestock population × EF_CH₄) × GWP_CH₄
Livestock population
Number of animals in each livestock category (head)
EF_CH₄
Enteric fermentation emission factor (kg CH₄/head/year)
GWP_CH₄
28, the 100-year Global Warming Potential of methane
CH₄ emissions
Annual methane emissions expressed as tonnes of carbon dioxide equivalent

3.1.2 Activity Data

  • The main activity data used to estimate enteric fermentation emissions are livestock population numbers by animal category. The Department of Agriculture published provincial livestock numbers for cattle, sheep, goats, swine and other livestock categories for the 2020–2024 period. These data provide the total number of animals per province but do not provide the full level of detail required to distinguish between herd composition and breed composition8.
  • To further disaggregate the provincial livestock totals, national herd and its composition data were applied. For cattle, the national herd composition was used to estimate the share of bulls, dairy cows, other cows, dairy heifers, other heifers, calves, young oxen and oxen. For sheep and goats, national breed composition data were used to estimate the share of Merino sheep, Karakul sheep, other woolled sheep, non-woolled sheep, Angora goats and other goats9.
  • The national composition shares were applied to the provincial livestock totals to derive a more detailed breakdown of livestock categories per province. This approach assumes that the national herd composition is representative of the livestock composition within the province. The resulting disaggregated livestock data were then used as the activity data for estimating enteric fermentation emission, as shown in the table below:
Table 3-1: Activity data used for estimating enteric fermentation emissions in Gauteng
Gauteng
Cattle
YearBullsCows over 2 yearsHeifers 1 to 2 yearsCalvesYoung oxenOxenTotal
DairyOtherDairyOther
20206,07931,40784,7647,43023,63972,26910,8079,118245,513
20216,13031,67085,1337,49223,49771,85210,8978,854245,524
20226,78829,18984,1748,14624,77768,56113,9169,843245,393
20236,79532,95578,48110,19224,12271,00713,2508,833245,636
20247,13531,93678,1419,85325,48163,87216,98712,231245,636
Gauteng
YearSheepGoatSwine
MerinoKarakulOther woolled sheepNon-woolled sheepTotalAngoraSwine
202044,0139816,24723,52583,88321,248154,693
202144,0179416,24423,52883,88319,240154,027
202244,0039416,24223,52183,85918,137153,999
202343,9619416,22323,50083,77818,033153,335
202443,9199416,21023,47483,69818,106153,582

3.1.3 Emission Factors (Enteric fermentation)

  • South Africa-specific enteric fermentation emission factors developed by the Department of Forestry, Fisheries and the Environment (DFFE) were applied for each livestock category. The emission factors used in the inventory to estimate emissions from enteric fermentation are shown in the table below:
Table 3-2: Enteric fermentation emission factors and sources per livestock category (DFFE)
LivestockEnteric Emission Factorkg CH₄ per head
Dairy cattleMature cows141.07
Heifers70.91
Other cattleCommercial bulls113
Commercial cows118.41
Commercial heifers118.41
Commercial calves51.6
Commercial young ox89.4
Commercial ox65.23
SheepCommercial wool9.95
Commercial meat13.8
Goat - AngoraCommercial mohair6.64
Commercial dairy19.99
SwineCommercial swine1.09

3.1.4 Emission Factors (Manure Management)

  • South Africa-specific manure management emission factors developed by the Department of Forestry, Fisheries and the Environment (DFFE) were applied for each livestock category. The emission factors used in the inventory to estimate emissions from enteric fermentation are shown in the table below:
Table 3-3: Emission factors for manure management (DFFE)
Live stockLagoon (%)Liquid / slurry (%)Dry lot / Kraals (%)Solid storage (%)Daily spread (%)Compost (%)Pasture Range Paddock (%)Ash content of manureUrinary Energy (% of GE)Gross Energy (MJ/day)Feed digestibility (%)Max CH4 capacity (m3 CH4/kg of VS excreted)Daily volatile solid excreted (kg dm)
Dairy Mature cows552055600.080.04358.90.70.2418.49
Dairy Heifers2980.080.04183.570.70.139.46
Commercial Other cattle3970.080.04255.30.60.1813.16
Sheep2980.080.0420.110.60.191.04
Goats2980.080.0427.90.60.181.44
Swine711113320.170.02

3.1.5 Assumptions and Data Limitations

  • Provincial livestock data were available only as total livestock numbers by animal type and no breakdown of herd or breed composition. National herd and breed compositions were therefore applied to disaggregate provincial livestock totals into the animal subcategories required for the emissions calculations. This assumes that the national livestock composition is broadly representative of the composition within Gauteng.
  • Provincial goat population data were available only as total goat numbers, with no national composition available to distinguish between commercial mohair and commercial dairy goats. The provincial goat population was therefore assumed to include 50% commercial mohair goats and 50% commercial dairy goats for the application of emission factors. This assumption should be reviewed if more detailed goat composition data become available
  • These assumptions should be reviewed and updated when province-specific herd and breed composition data become available

3.2 Liming

Liming emissions refer to carbon dioxide (CO₂) emissions released following the application of carbonate - containing lime to agricultural soils. Lime, including limestone and dolomite, is commonly applied to reduce soil acidity and improve nutrient availability and crop productivity. When these carbonate materials are applied to soil, they dissolve and release carbon dioxide.

3.2.1 Methodology

Liming emissions were estimated as direct carbon dioxide (CO₂) emissions resulting from the application of carbonate-containing lime materials to agricultural soils. Calculations were undertaken for maize, sunflower, soybeans, groundnuts, dry beans, sorghum and wheat for each inventory year from 2020 to 2024.

For each crop, the quantity of lime applied was estimated by multiplying the planted area by the relevant crop-specific lime application rate as determined by Tongwane et al (2016)12. The estimated lime quantity was then apportioned between limestone and dolomite using the assumed share of each material as used by the DFFE.

Separate carbon emission factors were applied to the estimated quantities of limestone and dolomite. The resulting carbon emissions were converted to CO₂ emissions using the molecular weight conversion factor of 44/12, as shown in Equation 3-2 below:

Equation 3-2: Calculation of Enteric Fermentation Methane EmissionsCO₂ emissions = Σ_c (Area_c × Application rate_c × (Limestone share × EF_Limestone + Dolomite share × EF_Dolomite) × 44/12)
c
Crop type (e.g. maize, wheat, soybeans, sunflower, etc.)
CO₂ emissions
Total annual carbon dioxide emissions from liming, expressed as (tCO₂e).
Area_c
Area planted for crop c (ha)
Application rate_c
Lime application rate for crop c (t lime/ha)
Limestone share
Fraction of agricultural lime applied as limestone (37%)
Dolomite share
Fraction of agricultural lime applied as dolomite (63%)
EF_Limestone
Carbon emission factor for limestone (t C/t limestone)
EF_Dolomite
Carbon emission factor for dolomite (t C/t dolomite)
44/12
Molecular weight ratio used to convert carbon (C) to carbon dioxide (CO₂)

Emissions from limestone and dolomite were added to determine total liming emissions for each crop. Crop-level emissions were then aggregated to determine total liming emissions for the province and inventory year.

3.2.2 Activity Data

  • Planted area data were used as the primary activity data for estimating liming emissions. Annual planted area data for maize, sunflower, soybeans, groundnuts, dry beans, sorghum and wheat were obtained for Gauteng for the 2020–2024 inventory period13.
  • The data were sourced from the Department of Agriculture, Land Reform and Rural Development (DALRRD) Crop Estimates Committee annual area planted and final production estimate reports. Planted area, expressed in hectares, was used to estimate the quantity of lime applied to each crop using the applicable crop-specific lime application rate.
Table 3-4: Area planted by crop type, 2020 - 2024
ProvinceCrop typeArea planted per crop type (ha)
20202021202220232024
GautengMaize105,000108,000112,500108,000116,000
Sunflower4,0004,4002,4002,2002,500
Soybeans36,00042,00045,00048,00056,000
Groundnuts00000
Dry beans600840800800850
Sorghum300300200100100
Wheat1,3001,1001,1009501,000

3.2.3 Emission Factors

  • Carbon emission factors were applied to estimate direct CO₂ emissions from the application of limestone and dolomite to agricultural soils. The factors were expressed in tonnes of carbon per tonne of lime material and were applied separately to the estimated quantities of limestone and dolomite.
Table 3-5: Carbon emission factors applied for liming emissions estimates (2006 IPCC default factors)
Lime materialCarbon emission factorUnitSources
Limestone0.12tC/tLiterature
Dolomite0.13tC/tLiterature

3.2.4 Assumptions and Data Limitations

  • Crop-specific lime application rates, expressed in tonnes of lime per hectare per year, were applied to the planted area data to estimate the total quantity of lime applied to each crop. This assumes that the applicable planted area receives lime at the assumed crop-specific application rate.
Table 3-6: Crop-specific lime application rates applied in the liming emissions calculation
CropLime application rateUnitSources
Maize0.50t/ha/yearLiterature
Sunflower0.57t/ha/yearLiterature
Soybeans0.90t/ha/yearLiterature
Groundnuts0.40t/ha/yearLiterature
Drybeans0.60t/ha/yearLiterature
Sorghum1.15t/ha/yearLiterature
Wheat0.63t/ha/yearLiterature
  • In the absence of province-specific data on the composition of lime products applied, total estimated lime application was assumed to be 37% limestone and 63% dolomite.
  • The emissions estimated under this category represent direct CO₂ emissions from lime application to agricultural soils.

3.3 Synthetic Fertilizer Application

Synthetic fertiliser application contributes to nitrous oxide (N₂O) emissions from managed agricultural soils. These emissions arise when nitrogen applied to soils is transformed through microbial processes following fertiliser application.

Application of synthetic fertiliser on the fields results in direct N₂O emissions and indirect N₂O emissions associated with nitrogen losses through volatilisation and leaching or runoff.

The following sections describe the activity data, methodology, emission factors, assumptions and data limitations applied to estimate emissions from synthetic fertiliser use.

3.3.1 Methodology

Synthetic fertiliser application emissions were estimated for the crops included in the inventory using a Tier 1 approach consistent with the 2006 IPCC Guidelines. The methodology covered both direct N₂O emissions from nitrogen applied to managed soils and indirect N₂O emissions resulting from nitrogen losses through volatilisation and leaching.

3.3.1.1 Direct N₂O Emissions from Synthetic Fertiliser Application

Direct N₂O emissions were estimated by first calculating the quantity of nitrogen applied to each crop. This was determined by multiplying the planted area by the applicable nitrogen application rate.

The estimated nitrogen applied was then multiplied by the direct emission factor (EF1) to estimate N₂O-N emissions. These emissions were converted to N₂O using the molecular weight conversion factor of 44/28 and subsequently converted to CO₂e using the global warming potential adopted for the inventory

Equation 3-3: Calculation of Direct N₂O from Synthetic fertilizer applicationN₂O emissions = Σ_c (Area_c × N Application rate_c × EF₁ × 44/28 × GWP_N₂O)
c
Crop type (e.g. maize, wheat, soybeans, sunflower, etc.)
N₂O emissions
Total annual direct nitrous oxide emissions from nitrogen application, expressed as tCO₂e
Area_c
Area planted for crop c (ha)
N Application rate_c
Nitrogen application rate for crop c (kg N/ha)
EF₁
Direct emission factor for nitrogen inputs to managed soils (kg N₂O–N/kg N applied)
44/28
Molecular weight ratio used to convert N₂O–N to N₂O
GWP_N₂O
265, the 100-year Global Warming Potential of nitrous oxide

Direct emissions were calculated separately for each crop, province and inventory year, and then aggregated to determine total direct N₂O emissions from synthetic fertiliser application.

3.3.1.2 Indirect N₂O Emissions from Synthetic Fertiliser Application

Indirect N₂O emissions were estimated from nitrogen losses associated with volatilisation and leaching. These losses occur after nitrogen fertiliser is applied to agricultural soils and a portion of the applied nitrogen is transferred to other environmental pathways.

Volatilisation

For volatilisation, the quantity of nitrogen lost as ammonia and nitrogen oxides was estimated by applying the volatilisation fraction (FracGASF) to total nitrogen applied. The resulting nitrogen loss was multiplied by the volatilisation emission factor (EF4) to estimate indirect N₂O–N emissions. These emissions were converted to N₂O using the molecular weight conversion factor of 44/28 and subsequently converted to CO₂e using the global warming potential adopted for the inventory.

Equation 3-4: Calculation of Indirect N₂O Emissions from Volatilisation of Synthetic FertilizersN₂O emissions = Σ_c (Area_c × N Application rate_c × Frac_GASF × EF₄ × 44/28 × GWP_N₂O)
c
Crop type (e.g. maize, wheat, soybeans, sunflower, etc.)
N₂O emissions
Total annual indirect nitrous oxide emissions from atmospheric deposition of nitrogen, expressed as tCO₂e
Area_c
Area planted for crop c (ha)
N Application rate_c
Nitrogen application rate for crop c (kg N/ha)
Frac_GASF
Fraction of applied nitrogen that volatilises as NH₃ and NOₓ (kg N volatilised/kg N applied)
EF₄
Emission factor for N₂O emissions from atmospheric deposition of volatilised nitrogen (kg N₂O–N/kg NH₃–N and NOₓ–N volatilised)
44/28
Molecular weight ratio used to convert N₂O–N to N₂O
GWP_N₂O
265, the 100-year Global Warming Potential of nitrous oxide

Indirect emissions from nitrogen losses associated with volatilisation were calculated separately for each crop, province and inventory year, and then aggregated to determine total indirect N₂O emissions from synthetic fertiliser application.

Leaching

For leaching, the proportion of nitrogen lost through leaching and runoff was estimated by applying the leaching fraction FracLEACH-(H) to total nitrogen applied. The resulting nitrogen loss was multiplied by the leaching emission factor (EF5) to estimate indirect N₂O–N emissions. These emissions were converted to N₂O using the molecular weight conversion factor of 44/28 and subsequently converted to CO₂e using the global warming potential adopted for the inventory.

Equation 3-5: Calculation of Indirect N₂O Emissions from Leaching of Synthetic FertilizersN₂O emissions = Σ_c (Area_c × N Application rate_c × Frac_LEACH × EF₅ × 44/28 × GWP_N₂O)
c
Crop type (e.g. maize, wheat, soybeans, sunflower, etc.)
N₂O emissions
Total annual indirect nitrous oxide emissions from nitrogen lost through leaching and runoff, expressed as tCO₂e
Area_c
Area planted for crop c (ha)
N Application rate_c
Nitrogen application rate for crop c (kg N/ha)
Frac_LEACH
Fraction of applied nitrogen lost through leaching and runoff (kg N leached and runoff/kg N applied)
EF₅
Emission factor for N₂O emissions resulting from nitrogen lost through leaching and runoff (kg N₂O–N/kg N leached and runoff)
44/28
Molecular weight ratio used to convert N₂O–N to N₂O
GWP_N₂O
265, the 100-year Global Warming Potential of nitrous oxide

Indirect emissions from nitrogen losses associated with leaching were calculated separately for each crop, province and inventory year, and then aggregated to determine total indirect N₂O emissions from synthetic fertiliser application.

3.3.2 Activity Data

  • Planted area data was used as the primary activity data for estimating direct and indirect emissions from synthetic fertiliser application. Annual planted area data for maize, sunflower, soybeans, groundnuts, dry beans, sorghum and wheat were obtained for Gauteng for the 2020–2024 inventory period.
  • The data is sourced from the Department of Agriculture, Land Reform and Rural Development (DALRRD)15 Crop Estimates Committee annual area planted and final production estimate reports. Planted area, expressed in hectares, was used to estimate the quantity of synthetic fertiliser applied to each crop using the applicable crop-specific N-application rate
  • The planted area data used in the synthetic fertiliser calculations are presented in Table 3-4

3.3.3 Emission Factors

  • Default emission factors and nitrogen-loss fractions from the 2006 IPCC Guidelines were applied to estimate direct and indirect N₂O emissions from synthetic fertiliser application.
  • For direct emissions, the estimated quantity of nitrogen applied to agricultural soils was multiplied by the direct N₂O emission factor, EF1. For indirect emissions, the relevant nitrogen-loss fractions and emission factors were applied to estimate N₂O emissions resulting from volatilisation and leaching or runoff. The emission factors and nitrogen-loss fractions used in the inventory to estimate direct and indirect emissions from synthetic fertiliser application are shown in the table below.
Table 3-7: Emission factors and nitrogen-loss fractions applied for synthetic fertiliser application
Emission typeParameterDescriptionFactorUnitSource
DirectEF1Direct N₂O emission factor for N applied to managed soild0.01(kg N₂O–N) (kg N applied)–1IPCC 2006 Guidelines, Chapter 11, Table 11.3
Indirect (Volatilisation)FracGASFFraction of applied nitrogen volatilised as NH₃ and NOₓ0.11(kg NH₃–N + NOₓ–N) (kg N applied)–1IPCC 2006 Guidelines, Chapter 11, Table 11.3
EF4N₂O emission factor for volatilised nitrogen0.01(kg NH₃–N + NOₓ–N) (kg N applied)–1IPCC 2006 Guidelines, Chapter 11, Table 11.3
Indirect (Leaching)FracLEACHFraction of applied nitrogen lost through leaching and runoff0.24(kg NH₃–N + NOₓ–N) (kg N applied)–1IPCC 2006 Guidelines, Chapter 11, Table 11.3
EF5N₂O emission factor for nitrogen lost through leaching and runoff0.011(kg NH₃–N + NOₓ–N) (kg N applied)–1IPCC 2006 Guidelines, Chapter 11, Table 11.3

3.3.4 Assumptions and Data Limitations

  • Crop-specific nitrogen application rates, expressed in kilograms of nitrogen per hectare, were applied to planted area data to estimate the total quantity of synthetic nitrogen fertiliser applied to each crop.
Table 3-8: Nitrogen application rates in South Africa
CropN-application rateUnitSources
Maize52.8kg N/haLiterature
Sunflower15.0kg N/haLiterature
Soybeans19.0kg N/haLiterature
Groundnuts180.0kg N/haLiterature
Drybeans24.9kg N/haLiterature
Sorghum30.0kg N/haLiterature
Wheat30.0kg N/haLiterature

3.4 Crop Residues

Crop residue emissions refer to nitrous oxide (N₂O) emissions from managed soils resulting from the decomposition of crop residues following harvest. Crop residues include both above-ground plant material, such as stalks, leaves and husks, and below-ground biomass, including roots. As crop residues decompose, nitrogen contained within the plant material is returned to managed soils, where microbial processes of nitrification and denitrification produce direct N₂O emissions. Indirect N₂O emissions also occur where nitrogen released from crop residues is lost through leaching and runoff.

In this inventory, crop residue emissions were estimated for maize, sunflower, soybeans, groundnuts, dry beans, sorghum and wheat cultivated in Gauteng for the 2020–2024 inventory period.

3.4.1 Methodology

Crop residue emissions were estimated using a Tier 1 approach in accordance with the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories (Volume 4, Chapter 11). The methodology is based on estimating the annual amount of nitrogen in crop residues returned to managed soils (FCR), which represents the nitrogen input from crop residues available for nitrification and denitrification. FCR forms the basis for estimating both direct and indirect nitrous oxide (N₂O) emissions from crop residues.

The annual amount of nitrogen in crop residues returned to managed soils (FCR) was estimated separately for each crop type using IPCC Equation 11.6. The calculation accounts for nitrogen contained in both above-ground and below-ground crop residues and incorporates crop-specific production, residue-to-crop production ratios, dry matter fractions, nitrogen contents and residue management parameters.

The estimated FCR per crop is subsequently used to estimate direct and indirect N₂O emissions. Direct emissions were estimated by applying the IPCC default direct emission factor (EF₁) to the total nitrogen input from crop residues, while indirect emissions were estimated by applying the default fraction of nitrogen lost through leaching and runoff (FracLEACH-(H)) together with the corresponding indirect emission factor (EF₅). Nitrous oxide emissions were converted to carbon dioxide equivalent (CO₂e) using a Global Warming Potential (GWP) of 265.

The annual amount of nitrogen in crop residues returned to managed soils (FCR) was estimated using Equation 3-6 below. A summary of the variables and parameters used in the calculation is provided in Table 3-9.

Equation 3-6: Calculation of the annual amount of nitrogen in crop residues returned to soilsF_CR = Σ_c (Crop_c × Frac_Renew(c) × ((Area_c − Area burnt_c × C_f) × R_AG(c) × N_AG(c) × (1 − Frac_Removed(c)) + Area_c × R_BG(c) × N_BG(c)))
c
Crop type (e.g. maize, wheat, soybeans, sunflower, etc.)
F_CR
Annual amount of N in crop residues (above and below ground) returned to soils (kg N)
Crop_c
Harvested annual dry matter yield for crop c, kg d.m. per ha
Area_c
Total annual area harvested of crop c, ha
Area burnt_c
Annual area of crop c burnt, ha yr-1
C_f
Combustion factor
Frac_Renew(c)
Fraction of total area under crop c that is renewed annually
Frac_Removed(c)
Fraction of above-ground residues of crop c removed annually for purposes such as feed, bedding and construction (kg N)
R_AG(c)
Ratio of above-ground residues dry matter
N_AG(c)
N content of above-ground residues for crop c (kg N (kg d.m.)-1)
R_BG(c)
Ratio of below-ground residues harvested yield for crop c
N_BG(c)
N content of below-ground residues for crop c (kg N (kg d.m.)-1)
Table 3-9: Variables Used in the Calculation of F_CR
#VariableDescriptionUnitsSource
aArea plantedTotal area planted under crop c, during the inventory year.HaLiterature
bProductionAnnual production of crop c, calculated from the planted area and crop yield.tLiterature
cYieldHarvested fresh yield for crop ct/haCalculated (b ÷ a)
dDRYDry matter fraction of harvested crop ckg d.m2019R IPCC, Chapter 11, Table 11.1A
eCrop_cHarvested annual dry matter yield for crop ckg/haCalculated (c × d)
fR_AG(c)Ratio of above-ground residue dry matter to harvested yield for crop ckg d.m. ha-1(kg d.m. ha-1)-12019R IPCC, Chapter 11, Table 11.1A
gR_S(c)Ratio of below-ground root biomass to above-ground shoot biomass for crop ckg d.m. ha-1(kg d.m. ha-1)-12019R IPCC, Chapter 11, Table 11.1A
hFrac_Renew(c)Fraction of total area under crop c that is renewed annuallyDimensionlessExpert judgment
iAG_DM(c)Above-ground residue dry matter for crop ckg d.m. ha-1Calculated (e × f)
jBGR_cAnnual total amount of belowground crop residue for crop ckg d.mCalculated ((e + i) × g × a × h)
kN_AG(c)N content of above-ground residues for crop ckg N (kg d.m.) -12019R IPCC, Chapter 11, Table 11.1A
lN_BG(c)N content of below-ground residues for crop ckg N (kg d.m.) -12019R IPCC, Chapter 11, Table 11.1A
mFrac_burntFraction of above-ground crop residues for crop c that are burnt in the field following harvest.DimensionlessExpert judgment
nFrac_removedFraction of above-ground crop residues of crop c removed annually for purposes such as feed, bedding and constructionDimensionlessExpert judgment
oR_BG(BIO)Ratio of below-ground biomass (roots) to harvested crop biomass for crop i.kg d.m. (kg d.m.)-12006 IPCC, Chapter 11, Table 11.2
pR_BG(c)Ratio of below-ground residues harvested yield for crop ckg d.m. (kg d.m.)-1Calculated ((o × (i × 1000 + e)/e)
qC_fCombustion factorDimensionless2019R IPCC, Chapter 2, Table 2.1
3.4.1.1 Direct N₂O Emissions from Crop Residues

Direct N₂O emissions from crop residues were estimated by applying the IPCC default direct emission factor (EF₁) to the annual amount of nitrogen in crop residues returned to managed soils (FCR). The resulting N₂O-N emissions were converted to N₂O using the molecular weight ratio of 44/28 and subsequently expressed as carbon dioxide equivalent (CO₂e) using a Global Warming Potential (GWP) of 265

Equation 3-7: Calculation of Direct N₂O Emissions from Crop ResiduesN₂O emissions = Σ_c (F_CR × EF₁ × 44/28 × GWP_N₂O)
c
Crop type (e.g. maize, wheat, soybeans, sunflower, etc.)
N₂O emissions
Total direct nitrous oxide emissions from crop residues, expressed as tCO₂e
F_CR
Annual amount of nitrogen in crop residues returned to managed soils (kg N/year)
EF₁
IPCC default direct emission factor for nitrogen inputs to managed soils
44/28
Molecular weight ratio used to convert N₂O–N to N₂O.
GWP_N₂O
265, the 100-year Global Warming Potential of nitrous oxide.

Direct emissions were calculated separately for each crop, province and inventory year, and then aggregated to determine total direct N₂O emissions from crop residues.

3.4.1.2 Indirect N₂O Emissions from Crop Residues

Indirect N₂O emissions from crop residues were estimated by applying the IPCC default fraction of nitrogen lost through leaching and runoff FracLEACH and the corresponding indirect emission factor (EF₅) to the annual amount of nitrogen in crop residues returned to managed soils (FCR). This accounts for N₂O emissions resulting from nitrogen that is transported from managed soils through leaching and runoff before undergoing further transformation. The resulting N₂O-N emissions were converted to N₂O and expressed as carbon dioxide equivalent (CO₂e).

Equation 3-8: Calculation of Indirect N₂O Emissions from Crop ResiduesN₂O emissions = Σ_c (F_CR × Frac_LEACH × EF₅ × 44/28 × GWP_N₂O)
c
Crop type (e.g. maize, wheat, soybeans, sunflower, etc.)
N₂O emissions
Total direct nitrous oxide emissions from crop residues, expressed as tCO₂e
F_CR
Annual amount of nitrogen in crop residues returned to managed soils (kg N/year)
Frac_LEACH
Fraction of applied nitrogen lost through leaching and runoff (kg N leached and runoff/kg N applied)
EF₅
IPCC default indirect emission factor for nitrogen losses through leaching and runoff
44/28
Molecular weight ratio used to convert N₂O–N to N₂O.
GWP_N₂O
265, the 100-year Global Warming Potential of nitrous oxide.

Indirect emissions from nitrogen losses associated with leaching were calculated separately for each crop, province and inventory year, and then aggregated to determine total indirect N₂O emissions from crop residues.

3.4.2 Activity Data

  • The primary activity data used to estimate crop residue emissions were the annual area planted (ha) and crop production (tonnes) for each crop included in the inventory. Area planted data were used to estimate annual crop production, which, together with crop-specific IPCC default parameters, formed the basis for estimating the annual amount of nitrogen in crop residues returned to managed soils (FCR).
  • Crop-specific planted area data and production for maize, sunflower, soybeans, groundnuts, dry beans, sorghum and wheat were obtained from the Department of Agriculture for Gauteng for the 2020 - 2024 inventory period. The planted area is presented in Table 3-4 and production data is presented in below:
Table 3-10: Production by crop type, 2020 \u2013 2024 (DALRRD, crop estimates committee)
ProvinceCrop typeProduction per crop type (tonne)
20202021202220232024
GautengMaize627,000751,200764,800756,500700,800
Sunflower5,6005,7203,0002,8603,000
Soybeans70,200105,00099,000105,60084,000
Groundnuts-----
Dry beans7801,092800880935
Sorghum9601,350800420390
Wheat8,1907,4257,3706,1756,700

3.4.3 Emission Factors

  • Default emission factors and nitrogen-loss fractions from the 2006 IPCC Guidelines were applied to estimate direct and indirect N₂O emissions from crop residues.
  • For direct emissions, the estimated quantity of nitrogen applied to agricultural soils was multiplied by the direct N₂O emission factor, EF1. For indirect emissions, the relevant nitrogen-loss fractions and emission factors were applied to estimate N₂O emissions resulting from volatilisation and leaching or runoff. The emission factors and nitrogen-loss fractions used in the inventory to estimate direct and indirect emissions from crop residues are shown in Table 3-7.

3.4.4 Assumptions and Data Limitations

  • Crop residue emissions were estimated using the IPCC Tier 1 methodology, with crop-specific default parameters for residue-to-crop production ratios, dry matter fractions, nitrogen contents and residue management factors. These default values may not fully reflect local crop varieties and management practices in Gauteng.
  • In the absence of province-specific residue management data, the following assumptions were applied based on expert judgement:
    • FracRENEW = 1.0, assuming complete annual renewal of the crops included in the inventory.
    • FracBURNT = 0.0, assuming that crop residues were not burnt in the field following harvest.
    • FracREMOVED = 0.90, assuming that 90% of above-ground crop residues were removed from the field.
  • All the above assumptions were applied consistently across all crop types assessed.
4LULUCF

The LULUCF sector looks at the changes of carbon stocks in a land use. The 2006 IPCC guidelines recommend that emissions and removals from this sector be calculated using data for at least 20 years. The emissions and removals are calculated for the land use remaining in the same land use and from the land use changes that might have occurred during the period.

4.1.1 Methodology

Emissions and removals were estimated for Forest Land, Cropland, Grassland, Wetlands, Settlements and Other Land. Changes in land area and associated carbon stocks were calculated for land remaining in the same category and land converted between categories. Positive values represent emissions, while negative values represent removals from the atmosphere.

4.1.2 Activity Data

The land use change matrix for the period 1990 – 2020 (Table 4-1) was used to calculate emissions and removals from this sector. The calculations were made for both land use remaining in the same land use, and the land use changes from one land use to the other.

4.1.3 Emission Factors

The sector emission factors were obtained from DFFE and the 1996 IPCC Good Practice Guidelines (Table 4-2)

4.1.4 Assumptions and Data Limitations

  • Land-use changes were assessed using the most recent available land-use matrix.
  • Emissions and removals were assumed to remain constant after 2020 until updated land-use data become available.
  • Default or nationally derived factors were applied where province-specific factors were unavailable.
  • The results are subject to uncertainty associated with land classification, mapping accuracy and the availability of province-specific carbon-stock data.
Table 4-1: Land change (ha) for Gauteng for 2020 (including 20-year conversion periods)
1990 GautengIndigenous ForestThicket / dense BushNatural Wooded LandPlanted ForestShrublandGrasslandsWaterbodiesWetlandsBarren LandEroded LandsCultivated commercial permanent orchardsCultivated commercial permanent vinesCommercial annuals pivot irrigatedCommercial annuals Non-pivotCultivated subsistenceBuilt-up Residential AlBuilt-up SmallholdingsBuilt-up CommercialBuilt-up IndustrialMinesTotal 2020Total Land Reductions
2020 Gauteng1234567891011121314151617181920
FLIndigenous Forest1----------------------
Thicket / dense Bush201,2451372981654537454--1-34167537414120573,4882,243
Natural Wooded Land3-42,41883,7063,1284,26351,9732826,26342541-1207,7983046,6972,5539365711,183212,28522,390
Planted Forest4-3,3021,51617,06451611,3571101,6402338-21,80627613849206253639,45422,390
GLShrubland5-48172383476614920-2294282753131821,2341,151
Grasslands6-30,93251,2798,15019,805454,6381,34918,84353016773-41366,8924299,9712,5811,2301,7539,246678,280223,642
OLWaterbodies7-66345185631,4868,2491,0468290-136511191364357713,3395,089
Wetlands8-3,6091,3403561358,81160129,6111413-153,11526894505536325749,41119,800
Barren Land9-8941,1644132,0458,893195290137212-121,761404251646416035417,03416,897
Eroded Lands10-1170618-1-5---0-1---116055
CLCommercial Permanent Orchards11-46572111196060-445-45710202020--1,5801,136
Commercial Permanent Vines12----------------------
Commercial Annuals Pivot Irrigated13-2154121061202,58331750-1-5,40016,560-1611300325,70820,308
Commercial Annuals Non-Pivot14-2,4933,9631,0001,66044,315232,37272469-679284,2741834195,117711104347,09762,823
Cultivated Subsistence15-119366227279833080---403301,20476321133,3742,171
SLBuilt-up Residential All16-9,74614,5936,0764,18547,773871,83188715-10912,722340129,4309,8861,456319306238,969109,539
Built-up Smallholdings17-3752,1627,2316112,42725114302-2825921,83897,514467914113,36215,848
Built-up Commercial18-7336623193593,1789462310-84881711,2491,0838,229492726,90218,672
Built-up Industrial19-9445493176294,0112296216916-571,253344,14571118012,47411225,77313,299
Mines20-9948693032054,5666351406880-01,845181,140683333109,95521,15911,205
Total 1990098,777163,26044,91234,785648,04311,63763,2501,2422401,076-6,899491,0692,748167,454121,66012,28316,31612,857
Total Land Lost097,53179,55527,84834,702193,4053,38833,6391,105235631-1,499116,7951,54438,02524,1464,0543,84212,902

Rows are the 2020 class, columns the 1990 class. Totals are as published; several differ by a unit or two from the sum of their own columns.

Table 4-2: Biomass growth or accumulation rates for the forest land (DFFE, 2024) categories
Land ClassForest typeBiomass growth rateRoot: Shoot ratioAGBDead Wood & litterTotal biomassLitterFLUFMGFIFuel densityCombustion factorFuel consumptionAccumulation rateHalf lifeAverage lifetimeDecay rateConversion factorTotal biomass
Indigenous forestPrimary (undisturbed)00.271784.671110.45
Secondary ≥ 20 yrs (disturbed)1.7
Secondary ≤ 20 yrs (disturbed)2.9
Thicket / dense bushPrimary (undisturbed)00.3528.21.351110.45
Secondary ≥ 20 yrs (disturbed)1.2
Secondary ≤ 20 yrs (disturbed)2.4
WoodlandsPrimary (undisturbed)00.2527.21.011110.56
Secondary ≥ 20 yrs (disturbed)0.9
Secondary ≤ 20 yrs (disturbed)1.9
Plantations83.22.38111
Annual non-pivot crops0.228.6103.45.83
Annual pivot crops0.228.6102.729.94
Subsistence crops0.226.57.81.367.2
Orchards1.80.4280.9114.886.860.721117.45
Vineyards0.660.4229.842.329.80.721112.89
Grasslands2.61.866.71.5510.8513.50.883.1
Low shrubland0.88.715.82.7211111.40.9110.4
Eroded land010.851
Degraded lands
Residential5.442.965.730.895.12.9
Smallholdings4.772.46.030.895.472.9
Commercial2.35
Industrial4.3
Settlements & mines111
5WASTE

This section describes the methodology, data sources, assumptions, and emission factors used to estimate greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from the waste sector in the provincial inventory. The waste sector includes emissions associated with the treatment and disposal of solid waste and wastewater. The assessment covers methane (CH₄) and nitrous oxide (N₂O) emissions generated from solid waste disposal, biological treatment of solid waste, wastewater treatment and discharge, and waste incineration, where applicable.

The IPCC waste categories included in the inventory are listed below:

  • 4A Solid Waste Disposal
  • 4B Biological Treatment of Solid Waste
  • 4C Incineration and Open Burning of Waste
  • 4D Wastewater Treatment and Discharge

5.1 Solid Waste Disposal

Solid waste disposal emissions arise from the anaerobic decomposition of biodegradable organic material contained in solid waste disposed of at managed disposal sites. As organic waste decomposes in the absence of oxygen, methane (CH₄) is generated and released to the atmosphere over many years. The quantity of methane produced depends on the amount and composition of waste disposed, climatic conditions, waste management practices, and the extent of methane recovery or oxidation occurring at the disposal site.

5.1.1 Methodology

Methane (CH₄) emissions from solid waste disposal were estimated using the Tier 1 methodology described in the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories (Volume 5: Waste). Annual municipal solid waste disposal quantities were first estimated using a population-based approach, whereby district population data were used to estimate the quantity of municipal solid waste generated and disposed of at landfill sites. These estimated waste disposal quantities formed the activity data for the emissions calculations.

Annual methane emissions were calculated using the IPCC equation below. A summary of the variables and parameters used in the calculation is provided in the table below.

Equation 5-1: Calculation of CH₄ emissions from solid waste disposalCH₄ emissions = ((MSW_T × MSW_F × L_O) − R) × (1 − OX) × GWP_CH₄
CH₄ emissions
Annual methane emissions from solid waste disposal expressed as tCO₂e
MSW_T
Total municipal solid waste generated (tonne waste/year)
MSW_F
Fraction of municipal solid waste disposed at solid waste disposal sites
L_O
Methane generation potential
R
Quantity of methane recovered through landfill gas collection systems (Gg CH₄/year)
OX
Oxidation factor, representing the fraction of methane oxidised as it passes through the landfill cover (dimensionless)
GWP_CH₄
28, the 100-year Global Warming Potential of methane.
Table 5-1: Variables used in the calculation of CH₄ emissions from solid waste disposal
#VariableDescriptionUnitsSource
aMSW_TTotal municipal solid waste generatedTonnes / yearCalculated using per capita rate (c) and provincial population data.
bMSW_FFraction of municipal solid waste disposed at solid waste disposal sites%NIR 2019 (2000-2015)/ IPCC 2006 Table 2A.1
cMSW_GRMunicipal Solid Waste generation rate, South AfricaTonnes / cap / year(DFFE)/IPCC 2006 Table 2A.1
dL_OMethane generation potentialDimensionlessSA national GHG inventory 2019
eRMethane recoveredDimensionlessSA national GHG inventory 2019
fOXOxidation factorDimensionlessSA national GHG inventory 2019

5.1.2 Activity Data

  • The activity data required for estimating methane emissions from solid waste disposal consist of annual quantity of municipal solid waste disposed at solid waste disposal sites (MSW_T.) As historical records of waste disposal quantities are not consistently available within the Gauteng Province, annual waste disposal quantities were estimated using district population data and a municipal solid waste generation rate (MSW_GR).
  • District population data were obtained from the following sources:
    • 2022: Census 2022 Municipal Factsheets (Statistics South Africa).
    • 2020 - 2021 and 2023 - 2024: District Population Estimates – Gauteng Report.
  • District population data is presented in the table below:
Table 5-2: Population by district, 2020 - 2024
ProvinceDistrictPopulation
20202021202220232024
GautengSedibeng1,000,1711,009,7891,190,6881,034,3471,047,662
West Rand977,228989,498998,4651,016,8721,031,513
Ekurhuleni3,747,4513,804,2594,066,6913,927,8353,993,139
CoJ5,433,1085,517,9444,803,2625,699,6635,798,739
CoT3,626,8253,702,9344,040,3153,866,4493,951,785
  • Where district population data were unavailable for a reporting year, population values were extrapolated using the available time series to produce a complete dataset for the inventory period.
  • Annual municipal solid waste generation was estimated by multiplying the district population by the municipal solid waste generation rate (MSW_GR), expressed in tonnes of waste generated per capita per year. The MSW_GR values were obtained from the Department of Forestry, Fisheries and the Environment (DFFE), which are based on the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories. MSW_GR used in this inventory is 0.398 tonnes/cap/year.
  • The resulting activity data (municipal solid waste in tonnes per year) obtained by multiplying the population by the MSW_GR is presented in the table below.
Table 5-3: Total Municipal waste generated (MSWT), 2020 - 2024
ProvinceDistrictMunicipal Solid Waste (tonnes)
20202021202220232024
GautengSedibeng236,054238,324281,019244,120247,263
West Rand333,319337,504340,562346,841351,835
Ekurhuleni1,333,3881,353,6011,446,9771,397,5711,420,807
CoJ1,976,4132,007,2741,747,2922,073,3782,109,419
CoT1,180,7641,205,5421,315,3811,258,7771,286,559

5.1.3 Emission Factors

  • Methane emissions from solid waste disposal were estimated using the default emission factors and model parameters provided in the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories (Volume 5: Waste). Where South African or provincial-specific values were unavailable, IPCC default values were applied in accordance with the Tier 1 methodology.
  • The emission factors and variables used in the estimation are presented in Table 5-1

5.1.4 Assumptions and Data Limitations

  • Annual municipal solid waste disposal quantities were estimated using district population data and a municipal solid waste generation rate (MSW_GR) due to the limited availability of historical waste disposal records at district level.
  • Missing annual population estimates and municipal solid waste generation data were estimated using the average of the available annual values. These estimates were subsequently used to derive activity data for all population-dependent waste source categories.
  • Where district population data were unavailable for a reporting year, population values were extrapolated using the available population time series.
  • The municipal solid waste generation rate (MSW_GR) was assumed to be representative of waste generation across all districts and reporting years.
  • IPCC default emission factors and model parameters were applied in accordance with the Tier 1 methodology where provincial- or country-specific values were unavailable.

5.2 Biological Treatment of Solid Waste

Biological treatment of solid waste includes the controlled biological decomposition of organic waste through processes such as composting and anaerobic digestion. These treatment methods reduce the amount of biodegradable waste disposed of at landfill sites and are used to recover nutrients and, in some cases, energy. Greenhouse gas emissions from biological treatment arise primarily from methane (CH₄) generated during the decomposition of organic waste.

5.2.1 Methodology

Emissions from biological treatment of solid waste were estimated using the Tier 1 methodology described in the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories (Volume 5: Waste). Annual quantities of organic waste treated through biological processes were obtained from the South African Waste Information Centre (SAWIC). In the absence of granular information on treatment technologies, it was assumed that 50% of the reported organic waste was treated through composting and 50% through anaerobic digestion. These quantities formed the activity data for the emissions calculations. The equations below were used to estimate the CH₄ emissions and N₂O emissions from biological treatment of waste respectively.

Equation 5-2: Calculation of CH₄ emissions from biological treatment of solid wasteCH₄ emissions = (((0.5 × M × EF_CH₄,C) + (0.5 × M × EF_CH₄,AD)) × 10⁻³ − R) × GWP_CH₄
CH₄ emissions
Annual methane emissions from biological treatment of waste expressed as tCO₂e
M
Total quantity of organic waste treated biologically (tonnes/year)
EF_CH₄,AD
Methane emission factor for anaerobic digestion (kg CH₄/tonne waste treated)
EF_CH₄,C
Methane emission factor for composting (kg CH₄/tonne waste treated)
R
Quantity of methane recovered (Gg CH₄/year)
GWP_CH₄
28, the 100-year Global Warming Potential of methane.
Equation 5-3: Calculation of N₂O emissions from biological treatment of solid wasteN₂O emissions = ((0.5 × M × EF_N₂O,C) × 10⁻³) × GWP_N₂O
N₄O emissions
Annual nitrous oxide emissions from biological treatment of waste expressed as tCO₂e
M
Total quantity of organic waste treated biologically (tonnes/year)
EF_N₂O,C
Nitrous Oxide emission factor for composting (kg N₂O/tonne waste treated)
GWP_N₂O
265, the 100-year Global Warming Potential of methane.

The total GHG emissions (tCO₂e) from biological treatment of solid waste were calculated by summing the methane (CH₄) and nitrous oxide (N₂O) emissions estimated using the equations above.

5.2.2 Activity Data

  • The activity data required for estimating emissions from biological treatment of solid waste is the annual quantity of organic waste treated through biological processes. Activity data were obtained from the South African Waste Information Centre (SAWIC).
  • Total quantities of waste treated through biological treatment is presented in the table below:
Table 5-4: Waste treated through biological treatment
ProvinceDistrictWaste treated through biological treatment (kg)
20202021202220232024
GautengSedibeng26,33326,33367,0008,0004,000
West Rand3,296,9893,296,9893,296,98977,02016,414
Ekurhuleni233,884,765213,430,800247,465,260256,749,614321,093,452
CoJ53,249,45929,849,81069,308,509116,324,961130,962,309
CoT52,060,40057,169,10072,545,76964,043,91866,447,040
  • The activity data presented above represent the variable M used in the methane (CH₄) and nitrous oxide (N₂O) emission equations.

5.2.3 Emission Factors

  • Methane (CH₄) and nitrous oxide (N₂O) emissions from biological treatment of solid waste were estimated using the default emission factors provided in the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories (Volume 5: Waste). Separate emission factors were applied for composting and anaerobic digestion to reflect the different emission characteristics of each biological treatment process. Where South African or provincial-specific emission factors were unavailable, the IPCC default values were applied in accordance with the Tier 1 methodology.
  • The emission factors used in the estimation are presented below:
Table 5-5: Emission factors used to estimate emissions from biological treatment of waste
Biological treatmentVariableCarbon emission factorUnitSources
Anaerobic digestionEF_CH₄,AD2g CH₄/kg waste treatedDFFE, 2024
CompostingEF_CH₄,C10g CH₄/kg waste treatedDFFE, 2024
EF_N₂O,C6g N₂O/kg waste treatedDFFE, 2024

5.2.4 Assumptions and Data Limitations

  • Annual quantities of organic waste treated through biological processes were obtained from the South African Waste Information Centre (SAWIC).
  • The SAWIC only reports the total mass of waste that is biologically treated which is the sum of composting and anaerobic treatment. Owing to this, it was assumed that of the total amount of biologically treated waste, 50% is composted and 50% is treated through anaerobic treatment.
  • Methane recovery from anaerobic digestion (R) was assumed to be zero

5.3 Incineration and Open Burning of Waste

Incineration and open burning of waste generate greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions through the combustion of municipal solid waste. Emissions are dependent on the quantity of waste burned and its composition, with different waste fractions producing varying amounts of carbon dioxide (CO₂), methane (CH₄), and nitrous oxide (N₂O). This category includes emissions from the uncontrolled open burning of municipal solid waste where waste collection services are unavailable.

5.3.1 Methodology

Emissions from incineration and open burning of waste were estimated using the Tier 1 methodology described in the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories (Volume 5: Waste). In the absence of district-level data on the quantity of waste openly burned, a population-based approach was adopted to estimate the quantity of municipal solid waste subject to open burning.

The methodology consist of the following steps:

Step 1: Estimate the population without access to municipal waste collection services by multiplying the annual district population (

  • Table 5-2) by the district-specific percentage of the population without waste collection, obtained from the literature (Table 5-6). The resulting population represents the estimated number of people without access to municipal waste collection services and forms the basis for estimating the quantity of municipal solid waste subject to open burning.
Table 5-6: Percentage of population without access to municipal waste collection services
ProvinceDistrictNo waste collection (%)
GautengSedibeng40.7%
West Rand14.3%
Ekurhuleni10.6%
City of Johannesburg8.6%
City of Tshwane18.2%
  • Step 2: Estimate the quantity of municipal solid waste generated by the population without waste collection services by applying the municipal solid waste generation rate (MSW_GR) (0.398 tonnes/capita/year) adopted from the DFFE methodology, which is based on the 2006 IPCC Guidelines. As shown.
  • Step 3: Apply the municipal solid waste composition fractions presented in Table 5-7 to disaggregate the estimated total quantity of municipal solid waste subjected to open burning into the individual waste types (e.g., food, garden waste, paper, wood, textiles, nappies, and plastics). The resulting quantities of each waste type were used as activity data in the emissions calculations.
Table 5-7: Municipal solid waste composition
Waste typeWaste Fraction (WFi)
Food0.2
Garden0.1
Paper0.12
Wood0.04
Textile0.03
Nappies0.18
Plastics, Other inert0.33

  • Step 4: Estimate greenhouse gas emissions from each waste type by applying the Tier 1 equations and emission factors provided in the 2006 IPCC Guidelines, Volume 5: Waste, to the activity data derived in Steps 1 - 3. The IPCC equations used to estimate emissions are presented below. Total emissions were calculated by summing the emissions across all waste types and GHG.
Equation 5-4: Calculation of CO₂ emissions from incineration and open burning of wasteCO₂ emissions = MSW × Σ_i (WF_i × dm_i × CF_i × FCF_i × OF_i) × 44/12
i
Type of waste open-burned
CO₂ emissions
Annual carbon dioxide emissions from incineration and open burning of waste, expressed as tCO₂e
MSW
Mass of municipal solid waste open-burned
WF_i
Waste fraction
dm_i
Dry matter content in the component i of the MSW open-burned, (fraction)
CF_i
Fraction of carbon in the dry matter (i.e., carbon content) of component i
FCF_i
Fraction of fossil carbon in the total carbon of component i
OF_i
Oxidation factor, (fraction) of component i
44/12
Molecular weight ratio used to convert carbon (C) to carbon dioxide (CO₂)
Equation 5-5: Calculation of N₂O emissions from incineration and open burning of wasteN₂O emissions = Σ_i (IW_i × EF_i) × 0.000001
i
Type of waste open-burned
N₂O emissions
Annual N₂O emissions from incineration and open burning of waste, expressed as tCO₂e
IW
Amount of solid waste of type i open-burned, Gg/year
EF_i
Emission factor for waste type i, kg N₂O/Gg of waste
0.00001
Conversion factor from kilogram to gigagram
Equation 5-6: Calculation of CH₄ emissions from incineration and open burning of wasteCH₄ emissions = Σ_i (IW_i × EF_i) × 0.000001
i
Type of waste open-burned
CH₄ emissions
Annual CH₄ emissions from incineration and open burning of waste, expressed as tCO₂e
IW
Amount of solid waste of type i open-burned, Gg/year
EF_i
Emission factor for waste type i, kg CH₄/Gg of waste
0.00001
Conversion factor from kilogram to gigagram

The total greenhouse gas emissions (tCO2e) from incineration and open burning of waste were calculated by summing the methane (CH₄) and nitrous oxide (N₂O) emissions estimated using the equations above.

5.3.2 Activity Data

  • The activity data required for estimating emissions from incineration and open burning of waste is the annual quantity of open-burned waste. This is identified by applying the proportion of South African population that has no access to waste collection services to total population from Census, it is assumed that this population fraction practices open burning of waste for Gauteng (Table 5-6)
  • The proportions in the table above are applied to total populations in Gauteng, which results in population with no access to waste collection services. To calculate the tonnes of waste burned, a municipal solid waste generation rate of 0.398 tonnes/cap/year was applied.
  • The tonnes of waste burned (tonnes) is the primary activity data used in this category.
  • Total quantities of waste burned is presented in the table
  • Table 5-2 below:
Table 5-8: Waste treated through biological treatment
ProvinceDistrictIncineration and open-burned waste (tonnes)
20202021202220232024
GautengSedibeng162,014163,572192,875167,550169,707
West Rand55,61856,31656,82757,87458,708
Ekurhuleni158,097160,494171,566165,708168,463
CoJ185,964188,868164,406195,088198,479
CoT262,713268,226292,664280,070286,251
  • The activity data presented above represent the variable M used in the methane (CH₄) and nitrous oxide (N₂O) emission equations.

5.3.3 Emission Factors

  • GHG emissions from burned waste were estimated using the default emission factors and model parameters provided in the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories (Volume 5: Waste). Where South African or provincial-specific values were unavailable, IPCC default values were applied in accordance with the Tier 1 methodology.

5.3.4 Assumptions and Data Limitations

  • Annual municipal solid waste disposal quantities were estimated using district population data and a municipal solid waste generation rate (MSW_GR) due to the limited availability of historical waste disposal records at the district level.
  • Missing annual population estimates and municipal solid waste generation data were estimated using the average of the available annual values. These estimates were subsequently used to derive activity data for all population-dependent waste source categories.
  • Where district population data were unavailable for a reporting year, population values were extrapolated using the available population time series.
  • The municipal solid waste generation rate (MSW_GR) was assumed to be representative of waste generation across all districts and reporting years.
  • IPCC default emission factors and model parameters were applied in accordance with the Tier 1 methodology where provincial- or country-specific values were unavailable.
6SCOPE 2

Scope 2 emissions are indirect GHG emissions associated with grid-supplied electricity purchased and consumed within the province. Although the emissions occur at electricity-generation facilities, they are attributed to the province because they result from electricity consumption within its boundary.

6.1 Methodology

Scope 2 emissions were calculated by multiplying annual provincial electricity consumption by the Eskom-reported grid emission factor (Equation 6-1). As the grid emission factor is expressed in tonnes of carbon dioxide equivalent per megawatt-hour (tCO₂e/MWh), electricity consumption reported in gigawatt-hours (GWh) was converted to megawatt-hours (MWh) before applying the grid emission factor. The calculation produces emissions directly in tCO₂e. Therefore, no additional conversion using global warming potentials (GWPs) was required.

Equation 6-1: Calculation of Scope 2 GHG emissions from purchased electricityScope 2 emissions = Electricity consumption × Grid Emission Factor
Scope 2 emissions
Indirect electricity-related emissions, expressed in tCO₂e
Electricity consumption
Grid-supplied electricity consumed within the province, expressed in MWh
Grid emissions factor
Eskom-reported grid emission factor, expressed in tCO₂e/MWh

6.2 Activity Data

  • The activity data used to estimate Scope 2 emissions were monthly electricity consumption data by province, obtained from Statistics South Africa’s Electricity Generated and Available for Distribution (P4141) dataset.
  • Monthly electricity consumption, reported in gigawatt-hours (GWh), was aggregated to determine the total annual electricity consumed within the province for each year from 2020 to 2024.
  • The annual electricity consumption was converted from GWh to megawatt-hours (MWh) before applying the corresponding annual Eskom grid emission factor. The annual electricity consumption values used in the calculations are presented in the table below.
Table 6-1: Gauteng annual electricity consumption
ParameterUnit20202021202220232024
Electricity consumptionGWh57,20357,91354,78151,81953,289

6.3 Emission Factors

  • Annual grid emission factors reported by Eskom were used to estimate Scope 2 emissions. The applied factors are based on Eskom’s total electricity sales and the total electricity available for distribution after excluding technical transmission and distribution (T&D) losses.
  • A separate emission factor was applied to each inventory year to reflect annual changes in the emissions intensity of grid-supplied electricity (Table 6-2). The factors are expressed in tCO₂e/MWh and therefore produce Scope 2 emissions directly in tCO₂e, with no additional GWP conversion required.
Table 6-2: Eskom grid emission factors
YearEskom Factor 1: Based on total electricity sales by Eskom, total available for distribution, after excluding technical losses through T&D
UnitsEmission FactorSource
2020tCO₂e/MWh1.080Eskom Integrated Report 2021
2021tCO₂e/MWh1.040Eskom Integrated Report 2022
2022tCO₂e/MWh1.010Eskom Integrated Report 2023
2023tCO₂e/MWh1.060Eskom Integrated Report 2024
2024tCO₂e/MWh1.080Eskom Integrated Report 2025

6.4 Assumptions and Data Limitations

  • Electricity consumption data were available only at the provincial level and were not disaggregated by district municipality. Scope 2 emissions could therefore not be estimated separately for each district within the province.
7SCOPE 3

Scope 3 emissions are indirect GHG emissions associated with activities occurring outside the provincial boundary but attributable to activities within the province. The Scope 3 sources included in this inventory were electricity transmission and distribution (T&D) losses and waste imported into Gauteng for disposal.

7.1 Electricity Transmission and Distribution Losses

Electricity transmission and distribution (T&D) losses occur when a portion of the electricity supplied through the national grid is lost before reaching end users. The emissions associated with generating this lost electricity occur outside the provincial boundary and are therefore reported as Scope 3 emissions.

7.1.1 Methodology

Scope 3 emissions from electricity T&D losses were calculated by multiplying annual provincial electricity consumption by the applicable annual electricity loss rate and Eskom grid emission factor. Electricity consumption was converted from gigawatt-hours (GWh) to megawatt-hours (MWh) before applying the emission factor.

Equation 7-1: Calculation of Scope 3 emissions from electricity transmission and distribution lossesScope 3 emissions (T&D losses) = Electricity consumption × T&D loss rate × Grid Emission Factor
T&D loss emissions
emissions associated with electricity lost during transmission and distribution (tCO₂e)
Electricity consumption
Grid-supplied electricity consumed within the province, expressed in MWh
T&D loss rate
Grid-supplied electricity consumed within the province, expressed in MWh
Grid emissions factor
Eskom-reported grid emission factor, expressed in tCO₂e/MWh

The grid emission factor is expressed in tCO₂e/MWh; therefore, the calculation produces emissions directly in tCO₂e and no GWP is applied.

7.1.2 Activity Data

  • Annual provincial electricity consumption was used as the primary activity data. The annual T&D factors presented in the table below were calculated by dividing Eskom’s total electricity available for distribution by its total electricity sold.
Table 7-1: Eskom energy losses
YearDistributionTransmissionTotal available for distribution GWhTotal electricity sold (GWh)SourceTotal Dist / Total Sold
20197.62.2237,215214,121Eskom IR 20241.108
20207.72235,486212,190Eskom IR 20241.110
20218.52.2234,407208,319Eskom IR 20241.125
20228.82.2231,356205,635Eskom IR 20241.125
202310.12.3219,423191,852Eskom IR 20241.144
20249.62.3226,226198,281Eskom IR 20241.141
20259.72.3215,319188,401Eskom IR 20241.143
20269.92.2210,648183,311Eskom IR 20241.149
  • Each factor was applied to provincial electricity consumption to estimate the total electricity supplied, including losses. Electricity lost during transmission and distribution was then calculated as the difference between the estimated total electricity supplied and the electricity consumed. The calculated energy losses are shown below:
Table 7-2: T&D losses
ParameterUnit20202021202220232024
T&D lossesGWh7,1558,3237,7217,4047,947

7.1.3 Emission Factors

  • Annual Eskom grid emission factors were applied to the estimated quantity of electricity lost during transmission and distribution.

7.1.4 Assumptions and Data Limitations

  • Electricity consumption data were available at the provincial level and could not be disaggregated by district municipality.

7.2 Waste Imported for Disposal

Waste imported into Gauteng refers to waste generated outside the provincial boundary and transported into the province for disposal. Although the associated emissions occur within Gauteng, they are attributable to waste-generating activities outside the province and are therefore reported as Scope 3 emissions

7.2.1 Methodology

Scope 3 emissions from imported waste were estimated using the annual quantity of waste imported into Gauteng for disposal. The imported waste quantities were assessed using the solid waste disposal methodology described in Section 5.1, applying the relevant emission factors and model parameters to estimate the associated methane emissions.

7.2.2 Activity Data

  • The activity data used were the annual tonnes of waste imported into Gauteng for disposal during the 2020–2024 inventory period. The imported waste quantities used in the calculations are presented in the table below:
Table 7-3: Imported waste quantities
ParameterUnit20202021202220232024
Imported waste (Landfilled)tonnes5,57558,1176,5355,78223,226

7.2.3 Emission Factors

  • The emission factors and model parameters applied to imported waste were consistent with those used to estimate emissions from solid waste disposal, as presented in Section 5.1.3.

7.2.4 Assumptions and Data Limitations

  • Imported waste was assumed to have the same composition and disposal characteristics as waste generated and disposed of within Gauteng.
  • Detailed information on the composition of imported waste and the specific disposal facilities receiving it was unavailable.
  • The estimates were limited to the reported quantities of waste imported into Gauteng for disposal.
8REFERENCES